Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2022

Hill v. Rivera

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:21-cv-05638
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hill v. Laureau, Judge Rogers transferred Hill’s civil-rights case to California’s Central District because the events, evidence, and witnesses were there.

Who this affects

Cymeyon V. Hill, Dr. Craig Laureau, and the other defendants; the case was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Eastern Division of the Central District of California.

What happened

Cymeyon V. Hill, who was representing himself, filed a civil-rights lawsuit against Dr. Craig Laureau and other defendants. His amended complaint concerned events at Patton State Hospital, where he had previously been incarcerated. Hill also asked to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court found that the Central District of California was the proper and more convenient venue. Patton State Hospital is in San Bernardino County, the relevant events occurred there, and the witnesses and evidence were likely there. The court also found no substantial connection between the claims and the Northern District of California.

The court transferred the case to the Eastern Division of the Central District of California and terminated all pending motions from its docket because they were no longer pending in that district. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hill v. Rivera · No. 4:21-cv-05638
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Jan. 7, 2022

Background

Cymeyon V. Hill, a civil detainee held at California State Prison—Sacramento, filed a civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He later filed an amended complaint, which became the operative complaint. The claims arose from Patton State Hospital, where Hill had previously been incarcerated. Hill also filed a motion to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Venue Analysis

The court considered whether the case should be transferred to another federal district. It determined that venue was proper in the Central District of California because the relevant events and omissions occurred at Patton State Hospital, which is in San Bernardino County. The court stated that the witnesses and evidence were likely to be found primarily in that district.

The court also found that none of the events giving rise to the complaint occurred in the Northern District of California. It stated that Hill did not reside in that district because California State Prison—Sacramento is not located there, and that Hill had not alleged a substantial connection between his claims and the Northern District.

Disposition

In the interest of justice and under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court transferred the action to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The clerk was ordered to transfer the case immediately. The court also terminated all pending motions on its docket because they were no longer pending in the Northern District. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.