Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2022

Najarian Holdings LLC v. CoreVest American Finance Lender LLC

Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Docket
4:20-cv-00799
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Najarian Holdings v. CoreVest, Judge Hamilton awarded CoreVest $692,079.50 in attorneys’ fees but denied its request for non-taxable costs.

Who this affects

CoreVest American Finance Lender LLC was awarded $692,079.50 in attorneys’ fees. Its request for $1,548.67 in non-taxable costs was denied, affecting CoreVest’s cost request and the plaintiffs’ opposition to the fee award.

What happened

Najarian Holdings LLC and the other plaintiffs opposed CoreVest American Finance Lender LLC’s request for attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs. The court considered the motion at a January 27, 2022 hearing.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Najarian Holdings LLC v. CoreVest American Finance Lender LLC · No. 4:20-cv-00799
Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Date
Jan. 28, 2022

Background

CoreVest moved for attorneys’ fees and $1,548.67 in non-taxable costs. The parties appeared through counsel at a January 27, 2022 hearing.

Attorneys’ fees

The court explained that attorneys’ fees are calculated under the lodestar method: the court multiplies the reasonable hours spent on the litigation by a reasonable hourly rate. CoreVest submitted attorney time records and client invoices supporting the hours claimed, along with cases supporting its attorneys’ hourly rates. The plaintiffs did not provide evidence showing that the rates were unreasonable and cited cases the court found inapplicable. The court rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that the requested award violated the Eighth Amendment or was excessive. It stated that a fee award not payable to the government is not a civil penalty and that the lodestar method governed the calculation.

Non-taxable costs and ruling

The court stated that California law disallows certain costs, including postage, telephone, and photocopying charges, except for exhibits. CoreVest did not support its request for non-taxable costs and withdrew that request at the hearing. The court therefore granted CoreVest’s motion for attorneys’ fees, awarding $692,079.50, and denied CoreVest’s request for $1,548.67 in non-taxable costs. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.