Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 12, 2021

Simon v. Maple Beach Ventures LLC

Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Docket
4:21-cv-01005
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
13
Fee PetitionContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Simon v. Maple Beach Ventures LLC, Judge Hamilton granted in part and denied in part Simon’s fee motion, awarding $28,098.99 in fees and $756.96 in costs.

Who this affects

Marcy Simon received $28,098.99 in attorneys’ fees and $756.96 in costs; the defendants were subject to that award under the consulting agreement.

What happened

Marcy Simon won an arbitration dispute against Maple Beach Ventures, LLC and obtained a court judgment confirming the arbitration award. She then asked the court to award her additional attorneys’ fees and costs for confirming that award in court, relying on the consulting agreement’s fee provision.

The defendants argued that Simon’s request was too high because her lawyers did unnecessary work, including preparing for service through the U.S. Marshals Service and using quarter-hour billing. Simon defended the work but offered to reduce certain entries if the court found overbilling.

The court granted in part and denied in part Simon’s motion. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton awarded $28,098.99 in attorneys’ fees and $756.96 in costs, excluding service-related work, applying a 10 percent reduction for block billing, reducing hourly rates by one-third, and excluding $904.80 in photocopy costs.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simon v. Maple Beach Ventures LLC · No. 4:21-cv-01005
Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Date
May 12, 2021

Background

Marcy Simon and Maple Beach Ventures, LLC entered into a consulting agreement in 2014. After a dispute arose, the parties submitted it to arbitration. On January 13, 2021, the arbitrator issued a corrected final award in Simon’s favor, including fees and expenses from the arbitration.

Simon petitioned the court to confirm the arbitration award and enter judgment. The defendants did not oppose that petition. On March 12, 2021, the court granted the petition and entered judgment in Simon’s favor. Simon later requested $46,986.25 in attorneys’ fees and $1,661.76 in costs for the court proceedings confirming the award.

Attorneys’ Fees

The consulting agreement stated that, in a related arbitration, legal action, or other proceeding, the losing party would pay the prevailing party’s actual attorneys’ fees and expenses, including those incurred in enforcing a judgment. The defendants did not dispute that this provision could support an award for the confirmation proceeding. They instead challenged the reasonableness of the amount requested.

The court used the lodestar method, which generally calculates a reasonable fee by multiplying reasonable hours by a reasonable hourly rate. The court found that Simon’s counsel was not entitled to fees for 6.75 hours spent researching and preparing for service through the U.S. Marshals Service because the defendants agreed to accept service within a week and that work did not meaningfully contribute to Simon’s success.

The court also applied a 10 percent reduction to the total fee request because the billing records used broad categories and did not show how much time was spent on particular tasks. The court declined to impose the defendants’ requested 20 percent across-the-board reduction based solely on quarter-hour billing.

The court further reduced each requested hourly rate by one-third because Simon did not provide competent evidence establishing prevailing rates for comparable attorneys in the relevant community. The resulting rates were $400 per hour for Kerry Garvis Wright, $383.33 for Thomas R. Burke, $300 for Tania Seanpanah, $273.33 for Allison Gipson, and $100 for Randy Carlos. The court calculated the attorneys’ fee award at $28,098.99.

Costs

Simon requested $1,661.76 in costs, including photocopies, online legal research, U.S. Marshals fees, shipping, and the civil filing fee. The defendants did not substantively dispute the costs. The court excluded $904.80 for photocopies prepared for service through the U.S. Marshals Service, reasoning that those costs were unreasonable for the same reasons as the related service-preparation work. It awarded Simon $756.96 in costs.

Disposition

The court granted in part and denied in part Simon’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton awarded $28,098.99 in attorneys’ fees and $756.96 in costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 13-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.