Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2022

Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co.

Judge
Jon Tigar
Docket
4:22-cv-00350
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Taad v. Bigge Crane, Judge Tigar ordered Bigge to respond to the remand motion and explain why sanctions should not be imposed.

Who this affects

Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. was ordered to respond to the remand motion and explain its failure to comply with the court's local rules; Jason Taad's remand motion remained undecided.

What happened

In Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co., Jason Taad asked the court to send the case back to state court. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. did not file an opposition by the deadline.

The court ordered Bigge to file either an opposition or a statement saying it did not oppose the motion by March 22, 2022. The court also ordered Bigge to explain in writing by that date why it should not be sanctioned for failing to follow local filing rules.

Judge Tigar scheduled a hearing on the sanctions issue for April 12, 2022, and continued the hearing on the motion to remand to April 28, 2022. The order did not decide the remand motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. · No. 4:22-cv-00350
Judge
Jon Tigar
Date
Mar. 8, 2022

Background

Jason Taad filed a motion to remand the case to state court on February 16, 2022. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co.'s opposition was due March 2, 2022, but the deadline passed without an opposition. Under the court's local rules, a party that does not oppose a motion must file a statement of non-opposition within the time allowed for an opposition.

Order

The court ordered Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition by March 22, 2022. It also ordered the defendant to show cause in writing by that date—meaning explain why the court should not impose sanctions—for failing to comply with the local rules.

The court scheduled a hearing on the order to show cause for April 12, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. It set March 31, 2022, as the deadline for Taad's reply on the remand motion and continued the remand-motion hearing to April 28, 2022, at 2:00 p.m.

Disposition

Judge Jon S. Tigar issued an order to show cause and set filing and hearing deadlines. The opinion did not rule on Taad's motion to remand or impose sanctions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.