Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2022

Ranson

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:22-cv-02413
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In re Ranson: Judge Rogers dismissed David Lewis Ranson’s prisoner complaint without prejudice and denied his incomplete fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

David Lewis Ranson’s prisoner civil-rights action was dismissed without prejudice, and his application to proceed without paying the filing fee was denied as incomplete.

What happened

In In re David Lewis Ranson, the plaintiff, an inmate, filed a federal civil-rights complaint without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. His application lacked a properly signed prison funds certificate and a trust-account statement.

The Clerk warned Ranson that he had 28 days to provide those documents and that the case could be dismissed if he did not. More than 28 days passed, and he submitted neither document.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed the action without prejudice, denied the fee-waiver application as incomplete, terminated the pending motions, and closed the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ranson · No. 4:22-cv-02413
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
June 13, 2022

Background

David Lewis Ranson, an inmate at the Maple Street Correctional Center, filed a prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He also applied to proceed without paying the filing fee, an application commonly called an in forma pauperis application.

The application was incomplete. Ranson filed a copy of his prison funds certificate that was not signed by an authorized prison officer, and he did not provide a copy of his prisoner trust-account statement. The Clerk notified him that he had 28 days to submit the required documents and warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal. More than 28 days passed without Ranson submitting either document.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice. It also denied Ranson’s fee-waiver application as incomplete, terminated all pending motions, and closed the file.

The order did not decide the underlying allegations in Ranson’s civil-rights complaint. The dismissal was based on the incomplete filing-fee application and missing financial documents.

Judge

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued the order on June 13, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.