Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2022

Maccord v. United States

Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Docket
5:22-cv-04186
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Donald Maccord v. United States of America, Judge Van Keulen transferred the time-credit petition to the Southern District of California.

Who this affects

Donald Maccord and the federal courts handling his petition; the case was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Southern District of California.

What happened

Donald Maccord filed a petition asking a federal court to review his claim that he was improperly denied time credits under the First Step Act.

Maccord was serving supervised release in the Southern District of California after being sentenced in the Northern District of California and imprisoned in Alabama.

Judge Susan Van Keulen transferred the case to the Southern District of California, directed the clerk to terminate pending motions, and ordered the entire file transferred there.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Maccord v. United States · No. 5:22-cv-04186
Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Date
July 22, 2022

Background

Donald Maccord filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a law that allows a person in federal custody or under federal supervision to challenge the way the sentence is being carried out. He argued that he had been improperly deprived of time credits under the First Step Act.

Maccord was sentenced in the Northern District of California, served approximately 20 months in a federal penitentiary in Montgomery, Alabama, and was on supervised release in the Southern District of California. The opinion also states that he initially sent the petition to the Central District of California, that the clerk's office mailed it to the Southern District of California, and that it was then inadvertently mailed to the Northern District of California.

Reasoning

The court explained that federal courts generally consider the district where a petitioner is confined to be the most convenient forum for a petition of this kind. It relied on that principle and on the authority to transfer a case when doing so serves the interests of justice. Because Maccord was on supervised release in the Southern District of California, the court treated that district as his district of confinement.

Order and effect

Judge Susan Van Keulen ordered that the case be transferred to the Southern District of California. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file. The order did not decide whether Maccord was entitled to the claimed First Step Act time credits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.