Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc.
- Vince Chhabria
- 3:22-cv-01708
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Calm Radio v. Calm.com, Judge Chhabria denied the motion to strike certain affirmative defenses.
The plaintiffs’ motion was denied, and the order concerned certain affirmative defenses asserted by Calm.com, Inc.
What happened
Calm Radio Corp. and other plaintiffs asked the court to strike certain affirmative defenses asserted by Calm.com, Inc.
The opinion does not explain the parties’ underlying dispute or the specific defenses challenged. It cites federal rules and two Northern District of California decisions.
Judge Vince Chhabria denied the motion to strike certain affirmative defenses.
The detailed version
- Calm Radio Corp. v. Calm.com, Inc. · No. 3:22-cv-01708
- Vince Chhabria
- July 25, 2022
Background
The plaintiffs filed a motion to strike certain affirmative defenses asserted by Calm.com, Inc. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or describe the specific defenses at issue.
Ruling
The court denied the motion to strike. It cited Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(b)(1)(A) and 12(h)(2)(A), as well as decisions from the Northern District of California. The order does not provide additional reasoning.
Disposition
The motion to strike certain affirmative defenses was denied.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.