Camacho v. Uppal
- Nathanael Cousins
- 5:21-cv-09026
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Camacho v. Uppal, Judge Cousins dismissed the settled case with prejudice, administratively closed it, and allowed reopening motions within 30 days.
Viridiana Camacho; Jimena Del Angel, a minor by and through her GAL Adan Del Angel Neris; and defendants Buta Uppal and Canada Road Carrier, Ltd. The action and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
In Camacho v. Uppal, the court was notified that the parties had reached a settlement and that no issue remained for the court to decide.
The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the clerk to administratively close the case, and vacated all scheduled dates.
Judge Cousins allowed any party to move to reopen the case within 30 days and retained jurisdiction for that same 30-day period.
The detailed version
- Camacho v. Uppal · No. 5:21-cv-09026
- Nathanael Cousins
- Jan. 30, 2023
Background
The court was notified that the action had been settled. The order states that no issue remained for the court's determination.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case and vacated all scheduled dates. Any party may move to reopen the case if the motion is filed within 30 days. The court retained jurisdiction for 30 days.
Effect
The case was dismissed with prejudice and administratively closed. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.