Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 28, 2023

Rivera v. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc.

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:22-cv-05208
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rivera v. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc., Judge Cousins dismissed the settled action with prejudice and administratively closed the case.

Who this affects

Rodrick Rivera and Caliber Bodyworks, Inc., along with the other defendants identified in the action, are affected because the action and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice and the case was administratively closed.

What happened

Rivera v. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. was dismissed after the court was notified that the parties had settled the action. The opinion states that no issue remained for the court to decide.

The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, meaning they cannot be brought again in this case. It also directed the clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed any party to seek reopening within 45 days.

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins issued the order on April 28, 2023. The court retained jurisdiction for 45 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rivera v. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. · No. 5:22-cv-05208
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Apr. 28, 2023

Background

The court stated that it had been notified of the settlement of the action and that no issue remained for the court to determine. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case and vacated all scheduled dates. Any party may move to reopen the case if the motion is filed within 45 days. The court retained jurisdiction for 45 days.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.