Esser v. McIntyre
- Jon Tigar
- 4:21-cv-03440
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Esser v. McIntyre, Judge Tigar ordered Esser to explain his nonappearance or face dismissal with prejudice.
Daniel Esser, whose case may be dismissed with prejudice if he fails to appear at the scheduled hearing and explain his failure to comply with the court's orders.
What happened
In Esser v. McIntyre, Daniel Esser did not file the required case-management statement or attend the July 11, 2023 conference.
The court ordered Esser to explain why he failed to comply and set a hearing for September 26, 2023. The court had not yet dismissed the case.
Judge Tigar warned that the case would be dismissed with prejudice if Esser failed to appear at the hearing.
The detailed version
- Esser v. McIntyre · No. 4:21-cv-03440
- Jon Tigar
- Aug. 29, 2023
Background
The court had ordered the parties to submit updated case-management statements by July 5, 2023, and to attend a case-management conference on July 11, 2023. Daniel Esser did not submit the required statement and did not appear at the conference.
Order to Show Cause
The court stated that Esser might no longer wish to prosecute the case. It ordered him to show cause—meaning to explain why the case should not be dismissed—for failing to comply with the court's orders. The court relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which allows dismissal when a plaintiff fails to prosecute or comply with the rules or a court order. The court also stated that it could dismiss the case on its own motion.
Hearing and Possible Dismissal
The court scheduled an order-to-show-cause hearing for September 26, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. Esser was required to tell the court whether he wished to continue prosecuting the case and explain his failure to attend the July 11 conference and file a case-management statement. The order did not dismiss the case at that time. It stated that the court would dismiss the case with prejudice if Esser failed to appear at the hearing. Judge Jon S. Tigar signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.