Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 29, 2023

American Small Business League v. United States Small Business Administration

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:22-cv-03325
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In American Small Business League v. SBA, Judge Chhabria granted SBA summary judgment and denied the League’s motion under the Freedom of Information Act.

Who this affects

The ruling affected the American Small Business League’s FOIA request for records from the United States Small Business Administration, including records from or related to the General Services Administration, alternate file formats, and business-size criteria.

What happened

In American Small Business League v. United States Small Business Administration, the League sought records under the Freedom of Information Act. The Small Business Administration produced responsive records in a comma-separated values file, and the League had access to the information in that file.

The court said the Administration did not have to obtain original records from another agency or search for records it did not possess. Because the original request did not ask for a specific file format or records about how the Administration determined whether businesses were small, the League was not entitled to an additional file or those records.

Judge Vince Chhabria granted the Administration’s motion for summary judgment and denied the League’s motion for summary judgment. The court ruled that no further relief was warranted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
American Small Business League v. United States Small Business Administration · No. 3:22-cv-03325
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Aug. 29, 2023

Background

American Small Business League (ASBL) brought a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The United States Small Business Administration (SBA) located and produced records in its possession that responded to ASBL’s original request. The SBA provided the records in a comma-separated values (.csv) file, and the opinion states that ASBL had access to the information in that file.

ASBL sought additional relief, including records from the General Services Administration (GSA), a .bak file in addition to the .csv file, and records concerning the criteria used to determine or verify whether a business was “small.”

Court’s Analysis

The court held that an agency is required to produce only records in its possession. The SBA therefore was not required to request original records from the GSA or search GSA records for information that the SBA did not maintain.

The court also held that ASBL could not expand its original FOIA request after receiving the responsive records. The original request did not specify a desired file format, apart from asking that the records be contained in a single database to the extent possible. The court found that the format the SBA provided was not unworkable, so ASBL was not entitled to an additional .bak file.

The original request also did not mention records concerning the criteria used to determine or verify whether a business was small. The court additionally noted that the SBA stated it had no such records because it did not independently assess the size of the businesses reported in its yearly goaling or Scorecards.

Disposition

Judge Vince Chhabria granted the SBA’s motion for summary judgment and denied ASBL’s motion for summary judgment. The court concluded that the SBA had met ASBL’s original FOIA request and that no further relief was warranted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.