Ruf v. Raging Waters San Jose
- Nathanael Cousins
- 5:22-cv-07458
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Ruf v. Raging Waters San Jose, Judge Cousins dismissed the settled action with prejudice and retained jurisdiction for 75 days.
Bonnie Ruf and defendants Raging Waters San Jose and others; the action and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice, and the case was administratively closed.
What happened
In Ruf v. Raging Waters San Jose, the court was notified that the parties had settled the action and that no issue remained for the court to decide.
The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the clerk to administratively close the case, and vacated all scheduled dates.
Judge Cousins retained jurisdiction for 75 days, during which any party may move to reopen the case if the motion is filed within that period.
The detailed version
- Ruf v. Raging Waters San Jose · No. 5:22-cv-07458
- Nathanael Cousins
- Sept. 7, 2023
Background
The court stated that it had been notified of the settlement of the action and that no issue remained for judicial determination. The opinion does not describe the settlement terms or the underlying claims.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case and vacated all scheduled dates. A dismissal with prejudice generally bars the dismissed claims from being brought again.
The court retained jurisdiction for 75 days. During that period, any party may move to reopen the case, provided the motion is filed within 75 days.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.