Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 26, 2023

Betty's Best, Inc. v. The Facebook Advertisers Listed on Schedule A

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:23-cv-04716
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil ProcedurePreliminary Injunction
In one sentence

In Betty’s Best v. The Facebook Advertisers, Judge Corley granted subpoena-related discovery but denied the remaining requested relief without prejudice.

Who this affects

Betty’s Best, Inc., the 592 Facebook advertisers listed on Schedule A, and Meta Platforms, Inc.

What happened

Betty’s Best, Inc. asked the court for a temporary restraining order, an asset freeze, expedited discovery, and a preliminary injunction against the Facebook advertisers listed on Schedule A.

The court granted Betty’s Best permission to subpoena Meta Platforms, Inc. for identifying information about 592 Facebook advertisers, including names, email addresses, telephone numbers, and physical addresses if available. The court denied the rest of the motion without prejudice.

The order limited how Betty’s Best could use the information and gave the advertisers and Meta time to challenge the subpoena before any information could be produced. Judge Corley also ordered Meta to preserve the requested information.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Betty's Best, Inc. v. The Facebook Advertisers Listed on Schedule A · No. 3:23-cv-04716
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Sept. 26, 2023

Background

Betty’s Best, Inc. filed an ex parte motion seeking four forms of relief: a temporary restraining order, an asset freeze order, expedited discovery, and a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Ruling on the subpoena

The court found that Betty’s Best had shown “good cause” to serve a third-party subpoena on Meta Platforms, Inc. under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court granted Betty’s Best leave to serve Meta with a subpoena seeking identifying information for 592 Facebook advertisers, including their names, email addresses, telephone numbers, and physical addresses if available. Betty’s Best must attach a copy of the order to the subpoena.

Betty’s Best may use information produced in response to the subpoena only to protect and enforce its rights in this action, as described in its motion and supplement.

Notice and challenges to the subpoena

Meta must serve the subpoena and a copy of the order on the defendants within 21 days after the subpoena is served on Meta. Each defendant and Meta have 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If that period expires without a defendant challenging the subpoena, Meta has 10 days to produce the responsive information for that advertiser. Meta may not produce the information before the 40-day period has expired. Meta must preserve the subpoenaed information while awaiting production or final resolution of a timely motion to quash.

Disposition

The court granted Betty’s Best leave to subpoena Meta and denied the rest of the motion without prejudice. The order disposed of the motion identified as Docket No. 16. Judge Jacquelyn Scott Corley entered the order on September 26, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.