Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.
- Jeffrey White
- 4:23-cv-01196
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc., Judge White dismissed Tangle’s claims with prejudice after it declined to amend its complaint.
Tangle Inc.’s claims were dismissed with prejudice, and the case was closed. The order followed the defendants’ earlier motion to dismiss, but this opinion does not state the grounds for that motion.
What happened
In Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc., the court had previously granted Aritzia, Inc., Aritzia LP, and United States of Aritzia, Inc.’s motion to dismiss without prejudice.
Tangle then filed a notice stating that it would not amend its complaint.
The court dismissed Tangle’s claims with prejudice and directed the clerk to close the case. Judge Jeffrey S. White issued the order.
The detailed version
- Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc. · No. 4:23-cv-01196
- Jeffrey White
- Nov. 9, 2023
Background
Tangle Inc. sued Aritzia, Inc., Aritzia LP, and United States of Aritzia, Inc. The opinion states that, on October 18, 2023, the court granted those defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice.
What Happened Next
On November 8, 2023, Tangle filed a notice of intent not to amend its complaint.
Ruling
The court dismissed Tangle’s claims with prejudice. It also directed the clerk of court to close the case. The order cited a Ninth Circuit decision stating that, after a plaintiff gives notice that it will not amend, the proper procedure is to enter judgment dismissing all claims with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.