Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 17, 2023

Hodges

Judge
Martinez-Olguin
Docket
3:23-cv-04048
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Hodges: Judge Martinez-Olguin transferred the unclear prisoner civil action to California’s Eastern District because venue appeared proper there.

Who this affects

James Albert Hodges, the Kern County officials he appears to target, and the courts handling the action in the Northern and Eastern Districts of California.

What happened

In re JAMES ALBERT HODGES concerns a handwritten letter that appeared to seek a civil action. Hodges was in custody and had not submitted a completed complaint or a complete application to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court construed a later handwritten filing as a complaint against Kern County officials. Because the events appeared to have occurred in Kern County and the defendants appeared to reside there, the court found that venue belonged in the Eastern District of California.

Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin transferred the action to that district. The court terminated the pending motions on its docket and said Hodges must complete the required fee-waiver application and send it to the Eastern District if he wishes to continue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hodges · No. 3:23-cv-04048
Judge
Martinez-Olguin
Date
Nov. 17, 2023

Background

James Albert Hodges filed a handwritten letter on August 10, 2023, that was difficult to read but appeared to seek a civil action. The Clerk notified him that the action could not proceed because he had not filed a complaint and a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee. The Clerk supplied forms and instructed him to submit a completed complaint and either pay the fee or return the application within 28 days.

Hodges later submitted an application, but it was incomplete because it did not include his six-month prisoner trust-account statement. He then filed a document titled “Claim” against the Kern County Superior Court using a California government claim form. The court found the document difficult to decipher but construed it as a complaint against Kern County officials.

Venue ruling

The court concluded that the complained-of acts appeared to have occurred in Kern County, which is in the Eastern District of California, and that the defendants appeared to reside there. Citing the federal venue statute, the court determined that venue properly lay in that district.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court TRANSFERRED the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California and directed the Clerk to transfer the case immediately. It TERMINATED all pending motions on its docket because they were no longer pending in the Northern District. The court stated that, if Hodges wished to pursue the action, he had to complete the application required by the Eastern District and mail it to that court. The order transferred the case without deciding the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.