Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2024

Albers v. Paul Revere Insurance Group

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:20-cv-08674
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Albers v. Paul Revere Insurance Company, Judge Cousins conditionally dismissed the settled case with prejudice and administratively closed it.

Who this affects

Leanne Albers, Paul Revere Insurance Company, and the other defendants named in the caption; the action and all claims were dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

In Leanne Albers v. Paul Revere Insurance Company, and others, the court was notified that the action had settled and that no issue remained for the court to decide.

The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed a party to seek reopening within 45 days.

Judge Nathanael Cousins ordered the dismissal on February 21, 2024, while retaining jurisdiction for 45 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Albers v. Paul Revere Insurance Group · No. 5:20-cv-08674
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Feb. 21, 2024

Background

The court stated that it had been notified of a settlement and that no issue remained for the court's determination.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action and all claims asserted in it with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case and vacated all scheduled dates.

The order allowed any party to move to reopen the case if the motion was filed within 45 days. The court retained jurisdiction over the case for 45 days.

Disposition

The action was dismissed with prejudice, and the case was administratively closed. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.