Jackson v. Brown
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:18-cv-02567
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Jackson v. Brown, Judge Wright adopted a recommendation and dismissed Wolske and Plotz without prejudice.
Richard Allen Wolske, Jr., and Jessica Plotz were dismissed without prejudice. The order does not state a disposition for the other defendants.
What happened
In Jackson v. Brown, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning two defendants, Richard Allen Wolske, Jr., and Jessica Plotz.
No timely objections were filed, so the court looked for obvious error in the recommendation. Finding none, it adopted the recommendation and dismissed Wolske and Plotz without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright issued the order on January 16, 2019.
The detailed version
- Jackson v. Brown · No. 0:18-cv-02567
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Jan. 16, 2019
Background
The court reviewed an October 24, 2018 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. The recommendation advised dismissing Defendants Richard Allen Wolske, Jr., and Jessica Plotz without prejudice. The opinion does not state the underlying reason for the recommended dismissals.
Review of the Recommendation
No party filed timely objections. Because there were no timely objections, Judge Wright reviewed the recommendation for clear error—an obvious mistake on the face of the record. The court found no clear error after reviewing the recommendation and the case materials.
Disposition
The court adopted the October 24, 2018 report and recommendation. It dismissed Richard Allen Wolske, Jr., and Jessica Plotz without prejudice. The order does not state a disposition for the other named defendants.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.