Stone v. Jesson
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- 0:11-cv-00951
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Stone v. Jesson, Judge Wright adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denied Stone’s request for an extra legal-materials storage bin at MSOP.
Plaintiff Charles Richard Stone, whose motion was denied; the order concerned his request involving MSOP.
What happened
Stone v. Jesson concerned Charles Richard Stone’s request for an order requiring MSOP to allow him an extra storage bin for legal materials.
No one filed objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The court reviewed it for clear error, found none, adopted it, and denied Stone’s motion.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright issued the order on February 11, 2019. The opinion does not explain the underlying reasons for the requested storage bin or the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
The detailed version
- Stone v. Jesson · No. 0:11-cv-00951
- Elizabeth Cowan Wright
- Feb. 11, 2019
Background
Plaintiff Charles Richard Stone asked the court to order MSOP to allow him an extra storage bin for legal materials. United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer issued a December 5, 2018 Report and Recommendation addressing the motion.
Court’s Review
No objections were filed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court therefore reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s decision. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the December 5, 2018 Report and Recommendation and denied Charles Richard Stone’s Motion for an Order Requiring MSOP to “Allow” Plaintiff an Extra Legal Materials Storage Bin. The opinion does not provide the underlying reasons for that recommendation or denial.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.