Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 15, 2019

Burks v. MN Disability Law Center

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:19-cv-01448
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Burks v. MN Disability Law Center, Judge Wright dismissed Burks’s complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute, including failure to pay the filing fee.

Who this affects

Robert Burks’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice; MN Disability Law Center was the defendant.

What happened

In Burks v. MN Disability Law Center, the court considered a recommendation to dismiss Robert Burks’s complaint because he had not prosecuted the case, including by failing to pay the filing fee.

Burks did not object to the recommendation within the permitted time. The court reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation and dismissed Burks’s complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burks v. MN Disability Law Center · No. 0:19-cv-01448
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Nov. 15, 2019

Background

United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued an October 4, 2019 Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of Robert Burks’s complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The recommendation identified Burks’s failure to pay the filing fee as part of the basis for dismissal.

Review of the Recommendation

Burks did not file objections within the permitted period. Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. The court found no clear error and adopted the recommendation.

Disposition

The court adopted the October 4, 2019 Report and Recommendation and dismissed Burks’s complaint without prejudice. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.