Abdirahman A. v. DHS-ICE Chief Counsel
- Eric Tostrud
- 0:19-cv-03172
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Abdirahman A. v. DHS-ICE Chief Counsel, Judge Tostrud accepted the recommendation and denied Abdirahman A.’s emergency motion.
The order directly affected petitioner Abdirahman A. by denying his emergency motion. The respondents were DHS-ICE Chief Counsel, the Attorney General, and the Sherburne County Sheriff.
What happened
In Abdirahman A. v. DHS-ICE Chief Counsel, the district court reviewed a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation concerning Abdirahman A.’s emergency motion.
No party objected to the report, so the court reviewed it for clear error. The court found no clear error in the report and recommendation.
Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the report and recommendation and denied the emergency motion.
The detailed version
- Abdirahman A. v. DHS-ICE Chief Counsel · No. 0:19-cv-03172
- Eric Tostrud
- May 12, 2020
Background
Magistrate Judge Katherine Menendez issued a report and recommendation on April 22, 2020. The opinion does not describe the relief sought in Abdirahman A.’s emergency motion or the underlying claims.
Court’s Review
No party objected to the report and recommendation. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed it for clear error—a mistake apparent from the record.
Ruling
The court found no clear error, accepted the report and recommendation, and denied Abdirahman A.’s emergency motion.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.