Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2020

Mobin v. County Hennepin Public Safty Faci

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:19-cv-02810
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Javed Mobin v. County Hennepin Public Safty Faci, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation, denied fee-waiver applications as moot, and dismissed without prejudice.

Who this affects

Javed Mobin’s case was dismissed without prejudice, and his applications to proceed without paying filing fees were denied as moot. The opinion does not identify any additional affected parties.

What happened

Javed Mobin v. County Hennepin Public Safty Faci concerned a report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. The district court reviewed that recommendation after no objections were filed.

Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the recommendation’s reasoning.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation, denied Mobin’s applications to proceed without paying filing fees as moot, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mobin v. County Hennepin Public Safty Faci · No. 0:19-cv-02810
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
July 22, 2020

Background

The court considered the March 9, 2020 report and recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or explain the recommendation’s specific reasoning.

Review of the Recommendation

No party filed objections to the report and recommendation. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error.

Disposition

The court adopted the report and recommendation. It denied Javed Mobin’s applications to proceed without paying filing fees as moot, meaning the applications no longer required a ruling. The court dismissed the matter without prejudice, as stated in the order, and directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.