Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 6, 2020

Zerwas v. Kwik Trip Inc

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:20-cv-00509
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zerwas v. Kwik Trip Inc., Judge Wright adopted the recommendation and dismissed Eugene Zerwas’s complaint without prejudice.

Who this affects

Eugene Zerwas’s complaint was dismissed; the opinion does not describe any further effect on the defendants.

What happened

In Zerwas v. Kwik Trip Inc., Eugene Zerwas sued Kwik Trip Inc., Mark W. Schneider doing business as Kwik Trip #662, and Convenience Store Investments, Inc.

A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation on July 15, 2020. No one objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The opinion does not state the recommendation’s reasoning.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed Zerwas’s complaint without prejudice. The court ordered judgment to be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zerwas v. Kwik Trip Inc · No. 0:20-cv-00509
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Aug. 6, 2020

Background

Eugene Zerwas brought a complaint against Kwik Trip Inc.; Mark W. Schneider, doing business as Kwik Trip #662; and Convenience Store Investments, Inc. The opinion does not describe the claims or the events underlying the complaint.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung issued a report and recommendation on July 15, 2020. No objections were filed. Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake apparent from the record. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation. The court dismissed Zerwas’s complaint without prejudice and ordered judgment to be entered. The opinion does not explain the basis for the dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.