Overby v. Simon
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-02250
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 3
In Overby v. Simon, Judge Wright denied Paula M. Overby’s motion for a preliminary injunction seeking election-related relief.
Paula M. Overby and her candidacy for Minnesota’s Second Congressional District; the Minnesota Secretary of State and Governor were the defendants against whom the requested orders were sought.
What happened
In Overby v. Simon, Paula M. Overby, the Legal Marijuana Now Party’s candidate for Minnesota’s Second Congressional District, sought emergency court orders after the party’s previous candidate died. She asked the court to support a special-election law, delay certification of election results, require a February 2021 special election, and order Minnesota to register her candidacy.
The court said the requested relief concerning the special-election law conflicted with its conclusions in an earlier related proceeding. In that proceeding, the court and the Court of Appeals had concluded that the law was likely overridden by federal law. As to her request for registration, Overby did not address the legal factors required for a preliminary injunction or provide a legal basis for that relief.
The court denied Overby’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright signed the order on November 2, 2020.
The detailed version
- Overby v. Simon · No. 0:20-cv-02250
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Nov. 2, 2020
Background
Paula M. Overby proceeded without a lawyer and identified herself as the Legal Marijuana Now Party’s candidate for Minnesota’s Second Congressional District. She said she replaced Adam Weeks after his death on September 21, 2020.
Overby sought several forms of emergency relief: a declaration that Minnesota Statutes § 204B.13, the Minnesota Nominee Vacancy Statute, was consistent with federal law; an injunction preventing defendants from certifying the congressional election results until the statute’s constitutionality was decided; a declaration that Minnesota could hold a special election under the statute; an order requiring the Governor to call a February 2021 special election; and an order requiring the Secretary of State to register her candidacy.
Court’s analysis
The court stated that the requested relief concerning the Minnesota Nominee Vacancy Statute was inconsistent with its conclusions in an earlier related proceeding. In that proceeding, the court had issued a preliminary injunction, and the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court had denied requests to pause that injunction. The Court of Appeals had stated that the statute was likely overridden by federal law. Relying on the reasons given in the court’s earlier order, the court denied Overby’s requested emergency relief concerning the statute.
For the requested order requiring registration of Overby’s candidacy, the court applied the four factors used for a preliminary injunction: likely success on the merits, irreparable harm, the balance of harms, and the public interest. The court said Overby did not address any of those factors or provide a legal basis supporting the requested injunction. It therefore concluded that she had not met her burden to obtain that relief.
Disposition
The court ordered that Overby’s motion for a preliminary injunction, docketed as Docket 29, was DENIED. This order addressed the preliminary-injunction motion; the opinion text does not state a final disposition of the underlying case.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.