Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-00090
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections, Judge Wright denied Hodges’s motion for a preliminary injunction after finding no clear error.
David Laurence Hodges’s request for a preliminary injunction was denied; the opinion does not state the effect on the underlying claims.
What happened
In Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections, David Laurence Hodges asked the court for a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the requested injunction’s details.
No one objected to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation and denied Hodges’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
The detailed version
- Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections · No. 0:20-cv-00090
- Wilhelmina Wright
- Nov. 23, 2020
Background
David Laurence Hodges filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not state the facts underlying the motion, the relief Hodges sought, or the claims in the case.
Review of the Recommendation
United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez issued a report and recommendation on October 23, 2020. Because no objections were filed, Judge Wright reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis. Judge Wright found no clear error.
Ruling
The court adopted the October 23, 2020 report and recommendation and denied Hodges’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The opinion does not provide the report and recommendation’s reasoning or otherwise resolve the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.