Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 26, 2021

Fukita v. Gist

Judge
Susan Nelson
Docket
0:20-cv-01869
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
6
Fee PetitionImmigration
In one sentence

In Fukita v. Gist, Judge Nelson granted in part and denied in part Fukita’s fee motion, awarding $19,125.36.

Who this affects

Tomoko Fukita received $19,125.36 in attorney’s fees and costs. Joshua Gist and Deborah Starr were ordered to pay that award.

What happened

In Fukita v. Gist, Tomoko Fukita sought to enforce two immigration support agreements signed by Joshua Gist and Deborah Starr. The court had entered a $44,456.97 default judgment against the defendants and allowed Fukita to seek attorney’s fees and costs.

Fukita requested fees and costs for two attorneys. The court found the work necessary and reasonable, approved Gregory McLawsen’s requested $14,989.36, and reduced Nicholas Ratkowski’s hourly rate, awarding $4,136 for his work and costs.

Judge Susan Richard Nelson granted in part and denied in part Fukita’s motion and awarded her a total of $19,125.36 in attorney’s fees and costs against the defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fukita v. Gist · No. 0:20-cv-01869
Judge
Susan Nelson
Date
Feb. 26, 2021

Background

Tomoko Fukita filed the lawsuit to enforce two Form I-864 Affidavits of Support. The affidavits were submitted by her former husband, Joshua Gist, and former mother-in-law, Deborah Starr, in connection with her immigrant visa petition. Fukita is a citizen of Japan and a lawful permanent resident of the United States.

Gist and Starr did not initially respond to the complaint or enter appearances. They later appeared without lawyers at a hearing on Fukita’s request for a default judgment and did not contest their support obligations. On January 28, 2021, the court directed entry of a $44,456.97 default judgment and found that Fukita could recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs under 8 U.S.C. § 1183a(c).

Fee request and analysis

Fukita requested $4,846.47 in fees and $500 in costs for local counsel Nicholas Ratkowski, plus $14,989.36 in fees and costs for national counsel Gregory McLawsen. The defendants did not respond.

The court used the lodestar method, which generally calculates a reasonable fee by multiplying the reasonable hours worked by a reasonable hourly rate. It found that McLawsen’s requested rate of $400 per hour was reasonable because of his experience and specialized knowledge of Form I-864 litigation. Although Ratkowski also had immigration-law experience, the court found that $300 per hour was reasonable for his level of experience rather than the requested $400 rate. The court found that Ratkowski’s 12.12 hours were reasonable and that the documented fees and costs were necessary, reasonable, and not excessive.

Ruling

Judge Susan Richard Nelson granted Fukita’s requested $14,989.36 for McLawsen’s fees and costs. The court granted in part and denied in part the request attributable to Ratkowski, awarding $3,636 in fees and $500 in costs, for $4,136. The court therefore granted in part and denied in part the motion for attorney’s fees and awarded Fukita a total of $19,125.36 in attorney’s fees and costs against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.