Yisrael v. Reding
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:20-cv-01744
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Yisrael v. Reding, Judge Wright granted Kevin Bieging’s motion, dismissing federal and state claims without prejudice.
David Yisrael’s federal claims against all defendants and his state-law claims were dismissed without prejudice; Defendant Kevin Bieging’s motion to dismiss was granted.
What happened
In Yisrael v. Reding, the district court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation after no party objected to it.
The court found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and granted Defendant Kevin Bieging’s motion to dismiss. It dismissed all federal claims against all defendants without prejudice and declined to hear the state-law claims, which it also dismissed without prejudice.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright ordered judgment entered accordingly. The opinion does not explain the legal basis of the claims or the recommendation’s reasoning.
The detailed version
- Yisrael v. Reding · No. 0:20-cv-01744
- Wilhelmina Wright
- June 24, 2021
Background
The order concerns Plaintiff David Yisrael’s case against Jeannice M. Reding and other defendants. The court considered a May 3, 2021 report and recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. No objections were filed.
Court’s Analysis
Because no timely objections were filed, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The court stated that it found no clear error. The opinion does not include the recommendation’s factual or legal analysis, so it does not explain the claims’ underlying legal bases or why dismissal was recommended.
Ruling
The court adopted the report and recommendation. It granted Defendant Kevin Bieging’s motion to dismiss. It dismissed all federal claims against all defendants without prejudice. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction—the authority to hear related state-law claims—and dismissed those state-law claims without prejudice. The court ordered judgment entered accordingly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.