Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 6, 2021

Siddiqui v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-00989
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Siddiqui v. Executive Affiliates, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation and dismissed Siddiqui’s complaint without prejudice.

Who this affects

Abdul Basit Siddiqui, whose complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and defendants Executive Affiliates, Inc., and Melissa Walker.

What happened

In Siddiqui v. Executive Affiliates, Inc., Abdul Basit Siddiqui sued Executive Affiliates, Inc., and Melissa Walker. The opinion does not describe the complaint’s allegations or the defendants’ positions.

A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation on September 24, 2021. No one objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed Siddiqui’s complaint without prejudice. The court ordered that judgment be entered, but this order does not explain the reason for dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Siddiqui v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. · No. 0:21-cv-00989
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Dec. 6, 2021

Background

Abdul Basit Siddiqui was the plaintiff. The defendants named in the opinion were Executive Affiliates, Inc., and Melissa Walker. The order does not state the claims in Siddiqui’s complaint, the parties’ factual positions, or the legal basis for dismissal.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a report and recommendation on September 24, 2021. No objections were filed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis or conclusion. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

The court adopted the September 24, 2021 report and recommendation. It dismissed Siddiqui’s complaint without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar refiling based on the dismissal itself. The court also ordered that judgment be entered. The order does not state why the complaint was dismissed.

Disposition

The report and recommendation was adopted, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.