Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2022

Clinkenbeard v. Kallis

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-02745
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Clinkenbeard v. Kallis, Judge Wright adopted the recommendation and transferred the action to the Southern District of Indiana.

Who this affects

Robert Clinkenbeard's action against S. Kallis was transferred from the District of Minnesota to the Southern District of Indiana.

What happened

Clinkenbeard v. Kallis involved an action brought by Robert Clinkenbeard against S. Kallis. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or issues.

A magistrate judge recommended a result, and neither party filed objections. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation and transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Clinkenbeard v. Kallis · No. 0:21-cv-02745
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Mar. 24, 2022

Background

The court considered the December 30, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the factual dispute between Robert Clinkenbeard and S. Kallis.

Review of the Recommendation

No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. When no timely objections are filed, the court reviews the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. Judge Wright reviewed the recommendation and found no clear error.

Ruling

The court adopted the December 30, 2021 Report and Recommendation. It transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.