Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled June 10, 2022

Udoh v. Janssen

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:21-cv-00099
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Udoh v. Janssen, Judge Wright allowed Udoh to appeal without paying upfront but required $55.69 immediately and the rest in installments.

Who this affects

Emem Ufot Udoh may proceed with his appeal without paying the entire appellate filing fee upfront, but he must pay $55.69 immediately and the remaining $449.31 through deductions from his prison trust account. Officials at the institution where he is confined must carry out the required notice and payment process.

What happened

In Udoh v. Janssen, Emem Ufot Udoh asked to appeal without paying the full filing fee upfront. The court said his appeal was not frivolous and that no law or other circumstance prevented him from proceeding this way.

The court granted Udoh’s application, but the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires prisoners to pay the full appellate filing fee over time. Based on Udoh’s account information, the court set an initial payment of $55.69.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright ordered the $55.69 payment immediately and required Udoh to pay the remaining $449.31 through deductions from his prison trust account. The clerk was ordered to notify the officials at the institution where Udoh is confined.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Udoh v. Janssen · No. 0:21-cv-00099
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
June 10, 2022

Background

Emem Ufot Udoh applied to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, meaning he sought permission to pursue the appeal without paying the entire appellate filing fee at the beginning. The court stated that it believed its May 9, 2022 order was correct, but concluded that Udoh’s appeal was not frivolous. The court also found that no statute or other circumstance prevented Udoh from proceeding IFP.

Filing-fee calculation

Because Udoh is a prisoner, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires him to pay the full filing fee even if he receives IFP status. The fee may be paid in installments. The statute requires an initial partial filing fee equal to 20 percent of the greater of the prisoner’s average monthly deposits or average monthly balance during the relevant six-month period.

Udoh’s average monthly deposits were $278.47, and his average monthly balance was $150.92. Because the deposits were higher, the court calculated the initial partial filing fee as 20 percent of $278.47, or $55.69. The court stated that the remaining balance of the $505 appellate filing fee would be collected through monthly deductions from Udoh’s prison trust account as required by the statute.

Ruling

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright granted Udoh’s application to proceed IFP on appeal, subject to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The court ordered the $55.69 initial partial filing fee paid immediately, required Udoh to pay the remaining $449.31 through the statutory installment process, and directed the clerk to notify officials at the institution where Udoh is confined.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.