Mayfield v. Super 8 Hotel
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:22-cv-01181
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Mayfield v. Super 8 Hotel, Judge Wright adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed Tara Mayfield’s action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Tara Mayfield’s action was dismissed without prejudice. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or any separate effect on the defendants.
What happened
In Mayfield v. Super 8 Hotel, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s June 7, 2022 report and recommendation. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
No party objected to the report and recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court ordered that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Mayfield v. Super 8 Hotel · No. 0:22-cv-01181
- Wilhelmina Wright
- July 26, 2022
Background
The court considered the June 7, 2022 report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. The opinion does not state the claims or factual allegations underlying the action.
Review of the Recommendation
No objections to the report and recommendation were filed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the June 7, 2022 report and recommendation. The action was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court also ordered that judgment be entered.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.