Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2023

Gorski v. Starr

Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Docket
0:22-cv-02346
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gorski v. Starr, Judge Wright adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Gorski’s petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Krissy Ann Gorski’s petition was dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The order named Mistelle Starr, Michael Segal, and Andre Matevousian as defendants, but it does not describe any separate ruling affecting them.

What happened

Krissy Ann Gorski filed a petition against Mistelle Starr, Michael Segal, and Andre Matevousian in Gorski v. Starr. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims.

A magistrate judge recommended dismissal. No one objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the recommendation and dismissed Gorski’s petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The order allowed the petition to be filed again, because the dismissal was without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gorski v. Starr · No. 0:22-cv-02346
Judge
Wilhelmina Wright
Date
Jan. 5, 2023

Background

Krissy Ann Gorski filed a petition against Mistelle Starr, Michael Segal, and Andre Matevousian. The opinion does not state the petition’s underlying legal claims or explain why the court lacked jurisdiction.

United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung issued a December 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation recommending a disposition of the petition. No party filed an objection.

Ruling

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), when no timely objection is filed, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright reviewed the recommendation and found no clear error. The court adopted the December 8, 2022 Report and Recommendation and dismissed Krissy Ann Gorski’s petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. The order states that judgment should be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.