Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 15, 2023

Kris Lindahl Real Estate, LLC v. RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty Inc.

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:22-cv-02000
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissIntellectual PropertyContract
In one sentence

In Kris Lindahl Real Estate v. RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty, Judge Blackwell granted dismissal, dismissing the copyright claim and complaint without prejudice.

Who this affects

Kris Lindahl Real Estate, LLC and Lindahl Realty, LLC lost their federal copyright claim and had their complaint dismissed without prejudice; RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty Inc. obtained dismissal of its motion.

What happened

Kris Lindahl Real Estate, LLC and Lindahl Realty, LLC sued RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty Inc. for breach of contract and willful copyright infringement.

The court dismissed the copyright claim because the complaint did not allege that any infringement occurred in the United States. After that federal claim was dismissed, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the contract claim.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell granted the motion to dismiss. The copyright claim and the complaint were dismissed without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kris Lindahl Real Estate, LLC v. RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty Inc. · No. 0:22-cv-02000
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
Mar. 15, 2023

Background

Kris Lindahl Real Estate, LLC and Lindahl Realty, LLC, referred to together as “Lindahl,” sued RE/MAX Escarpment Golfi Realty Inc., referred to as “Golfi.” Lindahl asserted a breach-of-contract claim in Count I and a willful copyright-infringement claim in Count II. Golfi moved to dismiss under the standard requiring a complaint to allege enough facts to make a claim plausible.

Copyright Claim

The court explained that the Copyright Act does not apply to conduct outside the United States. A copyright plaintiff therefore must plead facts supporting domestic infringement. The complaint contained no allegations that any act of copyright infringement occurred in the United States. The court granted Golfi’s motion to dismiss the copyright-infringement claim.

Contract Claim and Disposition

After dismissing the copyright claim, the only remaining claim was the breach-of-contract claim. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over that claim because it had dismissed the federal claim over which it had original jurisdiction.

The order granted Golfi’s Motion to Dismiss. It dismissed Lindahl’s copyright-infringement claim without prejudice. It also declined to exercise jurisdiction over the breach-of-contract claim and dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.