Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled May 8, 2023

Jacobs v. Discovery ID Media Co

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:23-cv-00222
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jacobs v. Discovery ID Media Co, U.S. District Judge Blackwell accepted the recommendation, dismissed the complaint without prejudice, and denied the fee application as moot.

Who this affects

Anderson Lee Jacobs’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and his application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs was denied as moot. The opinion does not explain the underlying claims or the dismissal’s reasons.

What happened

In Anderson Lee Jacobs v. Discovery ID Media Co, Polk Co WI Sheriff Dept, Brent Waak, Polk Co WI Sheriff, and Mark Biller, the district court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation after no timely objections were filed.

The court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none. The opinion provided here does not explain the claims or the recommendation’s reasons for dismissing the complaint.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell accepted the recommendation, dismissed the complaint without prejudice, denied the application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot, and directed entry of judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jacobs v. Discovery ID Media Co · No. 0:23-cv-00222
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
May 8, 2023

Background

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on March 31, 2023. No party filed timely objections. The opinion does not describe the claims in the complaint or the reasons given in the recommendation.

Court’s analysis

Because there were no timely objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. The court stated that it found no clear error.

Ruling

The court accepted the March 31, 2023 Report and Recommendation. It dismissed Anderson Lee Jacobs’s complaint without prejudice. It also denied Jacobs’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs as moot. The court directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.