Hernandez-Rivera v. Eischen
- Wilhelmina Wright
- 0:23-cv-00856
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Hernandez-Rivera v. Eischen, Judge Wright adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
The matter brought by Rafael Hernandez-Rivera against B. Eischen was dismissed without prejudice. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or explain the dismissal’s basis.
What happened
Hernandez-Rivera v. Eischen concerned a report and recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. The opinion does not state the underlying basis of the matter or the recommended dismissal.
No objections were filed. The court therefore reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed the matter without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar refiling. The court directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Hernandez-Rivera v. Eischen · No. 0:23-cv-00856
- Wilhelmina Wright
- July 27, 2023
Background
The matter was before the district court on a May 3, 2023 report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the reason the report and recommendation recommended dismissal.
Court’s Review
No objections were filed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error. The court found no clear error after reviewing the report and the case record.
Ruling
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright adopted the report and recommendation. The court dismissed the matter without prejudice and directed that judgment be entered. The opinion does not specify the basis for the dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.