Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 8, 2024

Steiner v. Ashworth

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:23-cv-03719
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Steiner v. Ashworth, Judge Blackwell dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and denied Steiner’s fee application as moot.

Who this affects

Valerie Steiner and Brian Ashworth. The case was dismissed without prejudice, and Steiner’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs was denied as moot.

What happened

In Steiner v. Ashworth, Valerie Steiner was the plaintiff and Brian Ashworth was the defendant. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, and no party filed timely objections.

The district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, accepted it, and dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. It also denied Steiner’s application to proceed without paying fees or costs as moot.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell entered the order on January 8, 2024. The order directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Steiner v. Ashworth · No. 0:23-cv-03719
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
Jan. 8, 2024

Background

United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on December 7, 2023. The opinion states that no timely objections were filed. When no timely objections are filed, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake.

The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the specific basis for the jurisdictional problem.

Ruling

After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, Judge Jerry W. Blackwell found no clear error and accepted it. The court dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The order also denied Valerie Steiner’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs as moot.

Disposition

The Report and Recommendation was accepted. The case was dismissed without prejudice, and the application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs was denied as moot. The court directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.