Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 13, 2024

Cary-Blake v. Amazon.com Services LLC

Judge
Jeffrey Bryan
Docket
0:23-cv-02725
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cary-Blake v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Judge Bryan adopted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

The action brought by Stephanie La’Donna Cary-Blake against Amazon.com Services LLC was dismissed without prejudice.

What happened

Stephanie La’Donna Cary-Blake sued Amazon.com Services LLC in Cary-Blake v. Amazon.com Services LLC. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a report and recommendation. No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cary-Blake v. Amazon.com Services LLC · No. 0:23-cv-02725
Judge
Jeffrey M. Bryan
Date
Feb. 13, 2024

Background

The opinion concerns an action brought by Stephanie La’Donna Cary-Blake against Amazon.com Services LLC. It does not describe the underlying claims or the events leading to the lawsuit.

United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation. No party objected to it.

Court’s Review and Ruling

Because no party objected, the court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The court found no clear error and adopted the recommendation.

Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The court also directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.