Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 12, 2019

Olsen v. R.Y. Management Co. Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:19-cv-06261
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Judge Ronnie Abrams closed Olsen v. R.Y. Management after the parties reported settling in principle, discontinuing the case without costs and allowing timely restoration.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendant are affected by the case’s discontinuance. The order does not state whether a class was certified or how any other similarly situated persons are affected.

What happened

In Olsen v. R.Y. Management Co. Inc., the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or settlement terms.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. It allowed either side to seek restoration to the court’s docket within 30 days, and stated that a later request could be denied solely because it was late.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also said that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement had to place the settlement terms on the public record and receive the court’s approval within 30 days. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Olsen v. R.Y. Management Co. Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-06261
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Nov. 12, 2019

Background

Thomas J. Olsen brought the action individually and on behalf of other persons described as similarly situated against R.Y. Management Co. Inc., doing business as South Cove Plaza. The opinion does not state the claims or provide details about the parties’ dispute.

Settlement and Procedure

The court stated that it had been informed that the case had been settled in principle. It did not describe the settlement agreement or state that the agreement had been finalized.

Disposition

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application to restore was made within 30 days. It stated that an application filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The court further ordered that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.