Chavez v. Wylie
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:18-cv-07965
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Chavez v. Wylie, Judge Abrams denied Juan Pablo Chavez’s request to seal his November 18 letter and explained how future sealing requests must be made.
Juan Pablo Chavez’s request to seal his November 18, 2019 letter was denied. Future filings in the action must follow the court’s stated sealing procedures.
What happened
In Chavez v. Wylie, Juan Pablo Chavez sent the court a letter dated November 18, 2019. The letter appeared to object to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and also appeared to ask that the letter be filed under seal.
The court said it could not find a sufficient basis to seal the entire letter. It also explained that any request to seal a future filing must follow the court’s specified procedures, including explaining the reasons and identifying the proposed redactions.
Judge Ronnie Abrams denied the request to file the November 18 letter under seal. She directed the clerk to mail Chavez a copy of the order.
The detailed version
- Chavez v. Wylie · No. 1:18-cv-07965
- Ronnie Abrams
- Nov. 19, 2019
Background
Juan Pablo Chavez sent a letter dated November 18, 2019. The court said the letter appeared to contain Chavez’s objections to Magistrate Judge Gorenstein’s Report and Recommendation. The letter also appeared to request that it be filed under seal, meaning that it would not be publicly available on the court’s electronic docket.
Sealing Request
The court stated that it could not discern a basis for sealing the letter in its entirety. Citing the Second Circuit’s standard, the court explained that sealing requires specific findings that it is necessary to protect higher values and that the sealing order is narrowly tailored to that purpose.
Ruling and Filing Instructions
The court denied Chavez’s request to file the November 18 letter under seal. The order also advised that any future request to seal or redact a filing must comply with Paragraph 5(A) of Judge Abrams’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The requesting party must submit a letter explaining the reasons for the request, a complete highlighted copy showing the proposed redactions, and a separate set containing only the pages on which redactions are sought. The court will review the proposed redactions individually. The clerk was directed to mail Chavez a copy of the order. The order does not state that the court ruled on the substance of Chavez’s apparent objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.