Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2019

Giorgobiani v. Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-08792
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Giorgobiani v. Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC, Judge Broderick ordered Marshals service for Gary Giorgobiani’s pro se religion-discrimination lawsuit.

Who this affects

Gary Giorgobiani, Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC, and Angie Cahill; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were also directed to take action.

What happened

Giorgobiani v. Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC concerns Gary Giorgobiani’s claims that his employer discriminated against him because of his religion under federal, New York State, and New York City laws.

Because Giorgobiani was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC and Angie Cahill. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and directed Giorgobiani to notify the court of any address change.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork and send it to the Marshals Service. The court also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from this order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Giorgobiani v. Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-08792
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Nov. 20, 2019

Background

Gary Giorgobiani, representing himself, brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. He alleged that his employer discriminated against him because of his religion. The defendants are Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC and Angie Cahill.

The court had previously allowed Giorgobiani to proceed without paying filing fees. In such a case, federal law requires the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court explained that the ordinary 90-day service period could not begin to operate in the usual way because Giorgobiani could not serve the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued.

Order

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons is issued. It directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Forty-Five Ten HY, LLC and Angie Cahill. The court stated that Giorgobiani should request an extension if service is not completed within that period.

The court also required Giorgobiani to notify it in writing if his address changes and stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail Giorgobiani a copy of the order and an information package.

Disposition and Classification

This was an order about proceeding without filing fees and serving the defendants; it did not decide whether the alleged discrimination occurred or whether Giorgobiani’s claims have merit. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. The order otherwise directed the Clerk and Marshals Service to carry out service. This is a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.