Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 22, 2019

Merryman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:15-cv-09188
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
17
Fee PetitionClass ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Merryman v. JPMorgan Chase, Judge Caproni granted in part and denied in part counsel’s request for fees, expenses, and service awards.

Who this affects

The ruling directly affected class counsel’s fee and expense recovery, the Merryman Plaintiffs’ requested service awards, and Chester County’s service award. It also affected the settlement fund available for eligible class members because the awarded fees and expenses were to be deducted from that fund.

What happened

In Merryman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., investors claimed that the bank improperly added a foreign-exchange spread when converting dividends for American Depositary Receipt holders. The parties reached a $9.5 million class-action settlement, which the court approved separately.

Class counsel requested $3,166,666.67 in attorneys’ fees, $264,680.05 in litigation expenses, and $2,500 service awards for each group of named plaintiffs. The request was based on claimed work that the court found substantially duplicated work in a related case and in an earlier filing of this case.

Judge Valerie Caproni granted in part and denied in part the motion. She awarded $731,063.99 in attorneys’ fees, $63,772.57 in expenses, and a $2,500 service award to Chester County Employees Retirement Fund, but awarded nothing to the Merryman Plaintiffs.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Merryman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. · No. 1:15-cv-09188
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Nov. 22, 2019

Background

The plaintiffs owned American Depositary Receipts, which represent ownership interests in shares of foreign corporations. Under deposit agreements, JPMorgan Chase Bank converted dividends and other cash distributions from foreign companies into U.S. dollars before distributing them to the receipt holders. The plaintiffs alleged that the bank added a spread to the foreign-exchange rates it obtained and thereby breached the deposit agreements. They asserted claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and conversion.

The case was first filed in the Western District of Arkansas and was dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The plaintiffs then filed the case in the Southern District of New York. The defendant’s motions to dismiss in the New York case were granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiffs later added Chester County Employees Retirement Fund as a plaintiff.

The parties reached an agreement providing for a $9.5 million settlement, less attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses, notice and administration costs, and taxes. In separate orders, the court certified a settlement class, approved the settlement as fair and adequate, and approved the plan for distributing the settlement.

Attorneys’ Fees

This opinion addressed only the motion for attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and service awards. Class counsel requested one-third of the settlement, or $3,166,666.67, based on a claimed lodestar of $3,191,242.50. A lodestar is the reasonable number of hours worked multiplied by reasonable hourly rates.

The court found the requested fees unreasonable. It emphasized the substantial similarity between this case and a related case against Citibank, for which the same law firm had already received $4,916,666.67 in fees and $678,434.41 in litigation expenses. The court also found substantial overlap between the complaint and motion-to-dismiss work performed in Arkansas and the nearly identical filings in New York. The court concluded that counsel had not shown that the billed work was not duplicated.

The court reduced the claimed hours for pre-complaint investigation and the Arkansas complaint and motion to dismiss by 80 percent. It reduced the claimed hours for the New York complaint, motion to dismiss, and motion for reconsideration by 85 percent. It reduced the hours for the remaining litigation phases by 75 percent. The resulting recalculated lodestar was $731,063.99. The court did not apply an additional multiplier because, in its view, the risks of the litigation had already been compensated in the related Citibank case.

Litigation Expenses

Class counsel requested $264,680.05 in expenses. The court reduced reimbursement for expert work by 75 percent because counsel had not shown that the expert’s work was not substantially duplicated in the related case. The court also reduced travel expenses by 20 percent because the requested amounts and supporting details were inadequate, including the lack of sufficient information about attendance at depositions and the length of attorneys’ stays.

The court disallowed all requested costs for computerized legal research, treating services such as Westlaw, LexisNexis, and PACER as law-firm overhead. It allowed $1,133 in court fees. The total award for expert expenses, travel expenses, and court fees was $63,772.57.

Service Awards and Disposition

Class counsel requested $2,500 service awards for the Merryman Plaintiffs and Chester County. The court awarded nothing to the Merryman Plaintiffs, finding it difficult to believe that their additional work in this case justified another $2,500 after they had received $20,000 from the related settlement. The court awarded Chester County the requested $2,500, noting that Chester County had also received a $2,500 service award in the related case.

Judge Valerie Caproni granted in part and denied in part the motion. The court awarded $731,063.99 in attorneys’ fees, $63,772.57 in litigation expenses, and a $2,500 service fee to Chester County. The clerk was directed to close the motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 17-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.