Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 22, 2019

Corpening v. Sawyer

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10736
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Corpening v. Sawyer, Chief Judge McMahon ordered the pro se petitioner to pay $5 or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Michael Christopher Corpening and the processing of his pending habeas petition.

What happened

In Corpening v. Sawyer, Michael Christopher Corpening filed a habeas petition without a lawyer, the $5 filing fee, or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court ordered him to pay the fee or submit a signed fee-waiver application within 30 days. The order did not decide the petition’s legal claims.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon stated that the case would be processed if Corpening complied, but the action would be dismissed if he did not. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Corpening v. Sawyer · No. 1:19-cv-10736
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 22, 2019

Background

Michael Christopher Corpening, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion does not describe the underlying habeas claims. Corpening submitted neither the required $5 filing fee nor an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court directed Corpening, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court explained that, if it granted the application, Corpening could proceed without paying the fee in advance. The Clerk was directed to assign the matter to Judge McMahon’s docket, mail the order to the plaintiff, and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

Disposition

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Corpening complied. The court stated that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not reach the merits of the habeas petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.