Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 25, 2019

McCurdy v. City Of New York

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:17-cv-05168
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil RightsSection 1983
In one sentence

In McCurdy v. City Of New York, Judge Woods awarded $4,487.50 in attorney’s fees and costs and allocated $650 from McCurdy’s judgment.

Who this affects

Chance McCurdy, Defendant Mitchell, McCurdy’s counsel, and the parties responsible for applying the $650 allocation from the judgment.

What happened

In McCurdy v. City Of New York, Chance McCurdy asked for attorney’s fees and expenses after prevailing in a civil-rights lawsuit. The application was made under federal law that allows fees for successful civil-rights plaintiffs.

The parties agreed that the award against Defendant Mitchell should include $3,750 in attorney’s fees and $737.50 in costs. Their only dispute was how much of McCurdy’s damages award McCurdy should pay toward those fees under the federal law governing prisoner lawsuits.

The court granted McCurdy’s application against Mitchell for $4,487.50. Judge Gregory H. Woods ruled that 25% of the judgment—$650—could be used to pay the attorney’s fees, and directed the clerk to close the fee motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McCurdy v. City Of New York · No. 1:17-cv-05168
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 25, 2019

Background

On October 28, 2019, Chance McCurdy moved for attorney’s fees and expenses under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 after prevailing in a lawsuit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion states that McCurdy and Defendant Mitchell agreed that the fee award would be capped at 150% of the verdict amount, plus reasonable costs. They calculated that amount as $3,750 in attorney’s fees and $737.50 in costs.

The court independently reviewed the billing records submitted by McCurdy’s counsel and found those amounts reasonable. The parties’ only disagreement concerned how much of McCurdy’s damages award McCurdy should pay toward the attorney’s fees.

Prison Litigation Reform Act Allocation

The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that, when a monetary judgment is awarded in a covered action, up to 25% of the judgment must be applied to satisfy attorney’s fees awarded against the defendant. The court cited decisions stating that using the full 25% generally helps require prisoners to bear part of the litigation cost, while recognizing that a lower percentage may sometimes be appropriate.

Here, the court applied the maximum 25%. It specifically noted that McCurdy decided during trial not to appear to testify. The court therefore permitted Defendant Mitchell to apply $650 of the judgment toward the attorney’s-fee award.

Ruling

Judge Gregory H. Woods granted McCurdy’s application for attorney’s fees and costs against Defendant Mitchell in the amount of $4,487.50. The court directed the clerk to terminate the motion at docket entry 172. The order addressed the fee application and did not state that the underlying case was dismissed or otherwise resolved by this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.