Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2019

Perez v. City Of New York

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:18-cv-09532
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Perez v. City of New York, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, allowing a 30-day reopening application.

Who this affects

Marilyn Perez, the City of New York, the New York City Police Department, and Deputy Inspector Keith Walton.

What happened

In Perez v. City of New York, the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, and directed the clerk to close the case. The parties could apply within 30 days to reopen it for good cause. They could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a request within that period.

Judge Valerie Caproni entered the order on December 4, 2019.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. City Of New York · No. 1:18-cv-09532
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Dec. 4, 2019

Background

Marilyn Perez sued the City of New York, the New York City Police Department, and Deputy Inspector Keith Walton. On December 4, 2019, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the settlement's terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The order allowed the parties to apply within 30 days to reopen the case. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement, and a late application or one lacking a good-cause showing could be denied on that basis. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and a request for an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

The court dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs and closed the case, subject to the stated 30-day procedures. Judge Valerie Caproni signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.