M.C. v. County of Westchester, New York
- Nelson Roman
- 7:16-cv-03013-NSR
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In M.C. v. County of Westchester, Judge Roman granted M.C.’s request to seal 15 summary-judgment exhibits containing sensitive medical and personal information.
M.C.’s privacy interests were affected because the court granted sealing of 15 exhibits containing sensitive medical and personal information; public access to those exhibits was correspondingly limited.
What happened
M.C. v. County of Westchester concerns M.C.’s request to file certain exhibits supporting an opposition to summary-judgment motions under seal. The lawsuit involves M.C.’s involuntary hospitalization, and the requested exhibits include medical records, communications with doctors, laboratory results, and photographs.
M.C. asked to seal 15 of the 66 exhibits, citing the sensitive medical and personal information they contain. The defendants consented to the request. The letter argued that sealing was necessary to protect M.C.’s privacy and that using initials or redactions would not adequately protect his identity in these documents.
Judge Nelson S. Roman granted the application to seal the requested exhibits. The available text does not provide a separate written explanation of the court’s ruling beyond the grant notation.
The detailed version
- M.C. v. County of Westchester, New York · No. 7:16-cv-03013-NSR
- Nelson Roman
- Dec. 6, 2019
Background
M.C., represented by counsel, requested permission to file 15 exhibits under seal in support of an opposition to the defendants’ summary-judgment motions. The lawsuit concerns M.C.’s involuntary hospitalization. The request stated that the exhibits contained highly sensitive information about M.C.’s medical condition and treatment.
The requested exhibits included public-health investigation records, a chest X-ray referral, hospital and medical records, physicians’ notes and letters, laboratory results, an interview report, photographs taken during M.C.’s confinement, photographs of his arrest, and a letter M.C. wrote to a psychiatrist. The letter stated that these 15 documents were among 66 exhibits supporting M.C.’s summary-judgment opposition. The defendants consented to the request.
Arguments in the Request
The request argued that the exhibits qualified for sealing because they contained medical records, direct communications with physicians, photographs of M.C., and extensive personal and biographical information. It relied on the standard that sealing judicial documents requires sufficiently strong reasons to overcome the public’s presumptive right of access. The request also argued that using M.C.’s initials or targeted redactions would not adequately protect his identity in these particular documents.
Ruling
Judge Nelson S. Roman granted the application to file the 15 identified exhibits under seal. The available text is a counsel’s letter bearing the court’s grant notation; it does not contain a separate judicial analysis or further limitation on the ruling.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.