Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Royal…
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Royal Interiors Finisher a/k/a Royal Interior Finisher Corp.
- Jesse Furman
- 1:19-cv-11250
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Drywall Tapers v. Royal Interiors, Judge Furman, ordered briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
The petitioner, Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and the respondent, Royal Interiors Finisher a/k/a Royal Interior Finisher Corp., were affected by the filing, opposition, reply, and service deadlines.
What happened
In Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Royal Interiors Finisher, the petitioner asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.
The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional supporting materials by December 23, 2019. The respondent’s opposition was due January 6, 2020, and any reply was due January 13, 2020.
Judge Jesse M. Furman also required electronic and overnight-mail service of the petition, supporting papers, and order, followed by an affidavit confirming service. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.
The detailed version
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Royal… · No. 1:19-cv-11250
- Jesse Furman
- Dec. 10, 2019
Background
On December 9, 2019, the petitioner filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment.
Order
Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered the petitioner to file any additional materials supporting the petition by December 23, 2019, and to serve those materials on the respondent by electronic means and overnight mail by the same date. The respondent’s opposition was due January 6, 2020, and the petitioner’s reply, if any, was due January 13, 2020. The petitioner also had to file an affidavit confirming service by December 24, 2019.
Disposition
The order established filing and service deadlines. It did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.