Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 16, 2021

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. 4343 Corp.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-02249
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. 4343 Corp.: Judge Furman set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The petitioners, who sought confirmation of an arbitration award, and 4343 Corp., the respondent, were affected by the filing, briefing, and service deadlines.

What happened

In Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. 4343 Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by March 30, 2021. It set April 13 for the respondent’s opposition, if any, and April 20 for the petitioners’ reply, if any. The petitioners also had to serve the petition, supporting papers, and the order electronically and by overnight mail, and file proof of service.

Judge Jesse M. Furman issued the order on March 16, 2021. The order set the briefing and service schedule but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:21-cv-02249
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 16, 2021

Background

The petitioners filed a petition on March 15, 2021, seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment.

Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by March 30, 2021. The respondent’s opposition, if any, was due April 13, 2021, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due April 20, 2021.

The court also ordered the petitioners to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent electronically and by overnight mail no later than March 30, 2021. The petitioners had to file an affidavit proving service by March 31, 2021.

Disposition

Judge Jesse M. Furman issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion does not state that the court granted or denied the petition to confirm the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.