Gonzalez v. Clark
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:19-cv-10542
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Gonzalez v. Clark, Judge McMahon remanded Gonzalez’s attempted removal of his state criminal case because removal requirements and legal grounds were absent.
Alvin D. Gonzalez’s attempt to move his ongoing Bronx County Criminal Court proceedings to federal court was sent back to that state court; the federal case was closed, and fee-free status for an appeal was denied.
What happened
In Gonzalez v. Clark, Alvin D. Gonzalez, filing without a lawyer in federal court, tried to move his ongoing criminal proceedings in Bronx County Criminal Court to federal court. He said, in unclear legal language, that his due process rights were being violated.
Judge McMahon explained that Gonzalez did not show that he filed the removal notice within 30 days after his arraignment, and he did not include required state-court documents or information. He also did not allege facts showing that federal law allowed removal of his criminal case.
Judge Colleen McMahon remanded the action to Bronx County Criminal Court and directed the clerk to close the federal case. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Gonzalez v. Clark · No. 1:19-cv-10542
- Colleen McMahon
- Dec. 16, 2019
Background
Alvin D. Gonzalez filed a notice seeking to remove his criminal proceedings in Bronx County Criminal Court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. He filed in federal court without a lawyer. The submission largely consisted of legal terminology and could be understood to allege that his due process rights were being violated in the ongoing state criminal proceedings. The opinion states that Gonzalez was represented by counsel in those proceedings.
The court had previously allowed Gonzalez to proceed without prepaying filing fees. It also noted information from the New York State Office of Court Administration indicating that Gonzalez was arrested on April 10, 2018, and arraigned on April 11, 2018.
Reasoning
Federal law strictly limits removal of state criminal prosecutions. A criminal defendant generally must file a removal notice no later than 30 days after arraignment or before trial, whichever comes first, and must include copies of the process, pleadings, and orders served in the state case.
The court found that Gonzalez’s notice did not provide facts showing that it was filed within 30 days after his arraignment. It also did not include information about, or pleadings from, the state criminal proceeding. Because the notice did not satisfy the procedural requirements for removal, the court concluded that the case had to be sent back to state court.
The court further explained that, even if the procedural requirements had been met, Gonzalez had not identified a legal basis for removing the criminal prosecution. He did not allege that he was a federal officer or armed-forces member being prosecuted for actions taken under federal authority. He also did not allege that he was unable to enforce in state court a right to racial equality. The court therefore found no statutory basis for removal.
Ruling
Judge Colleen McMahon remanded the action to Bronx County Criminal Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) because removal was improper. The clerk was directed to send the order to Gonzalez and the Bronx County Criminal Court, record service, and close the federal case.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Gonzalez permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order addressed whether the criminal case could be removed to federal court; it did not decide the underlying state criminal proceedings or Gonzalez’s due process allegation.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.