Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2019

Fragoso v. RA Arias Landscaping, Corp.

Judge
Paul Davison
Docket
7:16-cv-02292
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fragoso v. RA Arias Landscaping, Judge Davison approved the parties’ FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants in the Fair Labor Standards Act case; the settlement was approved and the case was dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

In Fragoso v. RA Arias Landscaping, Corp., the parties asked the court to approve their settlement of the plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. They submitted the request by letter dated December 9, 2019.

Because the court had limited familiarity with the case, it held a hearing on December 18, 2019. The parties’ lawyers explained the litigation risks that led them to compromise the claims.

Judge Davison found the settlement fair and reasonable. The court approved the settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fragoso v. RA Arias Landscaping, Corp. · No. 7:16-cv-02292
Judge
Paul Davison
Date
Dec. 18, 2019

Background

The parties asked the court to approve their settlement of the plaintiff’s Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The request was made under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a decision requiring court review of certain Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The request was submitted by letter dated December 9, 2019.

The court stated that it had limited familiarity with the issues in the case. It therefore held a hearing on December 18, 2019, at which the parties’ lawyers explained the litigation risks that motivated the settlement.

Ruling

After reviewing the settlement agreement and considering the lawyers’ representations, the court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable. Judge Paul E. Davison approved the settlement. The court also dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning the case was ended and could not be refiled.

Disposition

The settlement agreement was approved, and the case was dismissed with prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.