Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2020

Harvey v. Career Connections Associates LLC

Judge
Paul Davison
Docket
7:19-cv-02869
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
EmploymentFlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Harvey v. Career Connections, Judge Davison approved the fair and reasonable Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and Career Connections Associates LLC, whose Fair Labor Standards Act lawsuit was resolved through the approved settlement and dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

Harvey v. Career Connections Associates LLC concerned the plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and a proposed settlement agreement.

The plaintiff’s lawyer asked the court to approve the settlement under a cited Second Circuit decision. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or describe the underlying claims in detail.

Judge Paul E. Davison found the agreement fair and reasonable, approved it, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Harvey v. Career Connections Associates LLC · No. 7:19-cv-02869
Judge
Paul Davison
Date
Jan. 28, 2020

Background

The plaintiff asserted claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. By letter dated January 9, 2020, the plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to approve an attached settlement and release agreement, citing Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a Second Circuit decision. The opinion does not provide the settlement amount or describe the underlying claims in detail.

Ruling

After reviewing the agreement and considering the lawyers’ representations, the court found that the settlement agreement was fair and reasonable. Judge Paul E. Davison therefore approved the settlement agreement. The court also dismissed the case with prejudice. The agreement required settlement payments within 14 days after the court approved the settlement and dismissed the lawsuit.

Effect

The order approved the settlement and ended this case. Because the dismissal was with prejudice, the case was dismissed on that stated basis rather than left open for refiling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.