Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 30, 2019

Li v. U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:19-cv-06059
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Li v. U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd., Judge Abrams ordered the parties to discuss letting Magistrate Judge Moses conduct all proceedings after mediation failed.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in Li v. U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd. must discuss whether to consent to Magistrate Judge Moses conducting all further proceedings and must meet the applicable two-week filing requirements.

What happened

In Li v. U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd., the court said mediation had been unsuccessful. The case involves Cheung Shan Li, Stalin Pizarro, and Paola Pizarro as plaintiffs and U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd., Pinky World Inc., and Woi Yung Choi as defendants.

The court said the case would be referred to Magistrate Judge Moses for general pretrial matters. It ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily allow Judge Moses to conduct all further proceedings. If everyone agreed, they had to submit a signed consent form within two weeks; otherwise, they had to file a joint letter saying they did not consent without identifying who withheld consent. The court said withholding consent would not have adverse consequences.

Judge Ronnie Abrams did not decide the underlying claims. The order also reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act usually require court approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Li v. U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd. · No. 1:19-cv-06059
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Dec. 30, 2019

Background

The plaintiffs are Cheung Shan Li, Stalin Pizarro, and Paola Pizarro. The defendants are U.S. Jewelry House, Ltd., Pinky World Inc., and Woi Yung Choi. The court stated that mediation had been unsuccessful.

Referral and Consent Request

The court stated that, by a separate order, the case would be referred to Magistrate Judge Moses for general pretrial matters. It ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Judge Moses conduct all further proceedings.

If all parties consented, they were required to submit a fully executed consent form within two weeks of the order's date. If the court approved the form, Judge Moses would conduct all further proceedings instead of the district court judge. Any appeal from a final decision in that arrangement would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

If any party did not consent, the parties were required to file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they did not consent, without revealing the identity of the party or parties withholding consent. The order stated that withholding consent would not result in adverse consequences.

Other Reminder and Effect

The court reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally must be approved by the court, citing Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The order did not decide the merits of the parties' claims, resolve a motion, or enter judgment. Judge Ronnie Abrams issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.